SPOILERS FOR HOUSE, MD S4 FOLLOWSo, okay, maybe it's just me, but ...
Wouldn't it have been nice if House's new team didn't follow the same 'we're diverse!!' white male, white female, ethnic one, formula that his first team had followed? One I can let go, but when a second team has the exact same thing, it starts to look like a conscious effort to show
just enough diversity.
I mean, how hard would it have been to have a non-white woman on the team? I
know I saw an Indian woman among the competitors before House purged all the women. (Oh, we couldn't do that! She might not conform to our Western ideals of beauty!) Or, hell,
two woman on the team? Or maybe more than one token non-white person? And really, as much as I didn't really like Amber, wouldn't it have been nice for the team's one female member to be someone strong and ambitious rather than someone who is clearly supposed to be sympathetic and emotive--that is, stereotypically female?
(
ETA: All right, in all fairness to 13, she is
not portrayed as a wimp, or a wilting flower. It's just that, compared to Amber, everyone else seems less ambitious, or at least more concerned about the feelings of others.)
I mean, I know this is just a TV show, okay? I and can understand the argument that House himself viewed Foreman as a token, and might view Kutner the same way, and selected him in the end in order to have one non-white person. I can see that argument. BUT. This
is a TV show, and as such, the ultimate choice for cast is in the hands of the production staff, not one of the characters.
I
know I'm probably over-reacting and over-analyzing, you don't need to tell me that. I
know it's just a TV show. But TV shows to reflect the rest of society. So, yeah.